Democrats Aim to Restart Biden's Stalled Economic Agenda

Democrats Aim to Restart Biden's Stalled Economic Agenda

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the political dynamics surrounding Joe Manchin's opposition to a bill and Senator Schumer's efforts to negotiate. It highlights the legislative challenges and missed timelines, particularly around the Build Back Better vote. The potential for compromise in the Senate is explored, with a focus on key issues like funding programs for a full 10 years, such as the child tax credits, and the need to slim down or cut programs to achieve this.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Senator Schumer's strategy to address Joe Manchin's opposition?

To abandon the Billback Better plan entirely

To replace Manchin with another senator

To negotiate and push for a vote on the Billback Better plan

To ignore Manchin's stance and proceed without him

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the Senate's initial plan regarding the Billback Better vote?

To hold the vote after New Year's

To cancel the vote altogether

To conduct the vote before Christmas

To delay the vote indefinitely

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was one of the key issues raised by Senator Manchin?

The lack of public support for the Billback Better plan

The exclusion of certain states from the benefits

The short-term funding of programs like the child tax credits

The high cost of the Billback Better plan

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did Senator Manchin propose regarding program funding?

To ensure programs are funded for a full 10 years

To increase the number of programs without additional funding

To eliminate all programs

To fund programs for only one year

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What might be necessary to ensure long-term funding for programs?

Increasing taxes

Borrowing more money

Reducing the funding duration to five years

Slimming down or cutting some programs