Design Microservices Architecture with Patterns and Principles - Transaction Management of Monolithic Architecture-2

The video tutorial discusses monotech architectures, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages, particularly in transaction management. It explains how transaction management is simpler in monotech architectures compared to microservices, using ORM tools and unit of work patterns. An example from the ecommerce domain illustrates how transactions are managed in a single context, allowing for easy commit and rollback operations. The video concludes by hinting at the complexities of transaction management in microservice architectures, which will be covered in future videos.

What is one of the main advantages of monotech architectures over microservice architectures?

• Reduced complexity

• Easier transaction management

• Faster deployment

• Scalability

Which tool is commonly used in frameworks for transaction management in monotech architectures?

• ORM tools

• REST API

• Docker

• GraphQL

In monotech architectures, how are transactions typically managed?

• Within a single context

• Using multiple databases

• Through distributed systems

• By external services

What happens to transactions in a monotech architecture if a rollback is initiated?

• They are saved to the database

• They are sent to a backup server

• They are deleted from memory

• They are partially committed

In the ecommerce example, which operation is NOT mentioned as part of the transactional scope?

• Due payment

• Generate bill

• Decrease stock

• User authentication