Appeal from Arbitration

The video tutorial explains arbitration as an alternative to litigation, highlighting its lack of appeal options. It discusses how parties can challenge arbitration decisions, especially when they believe the arbitration was invalid or the arbitrator exceeded their authority. The tutorial differentiates between mandatory and voluntary arbitration, noting that mandatory arbitration is subject to constitutional standards and may allow for appeals. It also covers the de Novo review process, where a trial court reviews the facts of a mandated arbitration to ensure due process was followed.

What is a key characteristic of arbitration compared to judicial action?

• It is an alternative resolution method with no real appeal.

• It is always mandatory.

• It is a judicial action.

• It allows for multiple appeals.

How can parties challenge involuntary arbitration?

• By ignoring the arbitration results.

• By appealing to the Supreme Court.

• By requesting a retrial in the same arbitration panel.

• By filing new allegations that the arbitration was invalid.

What must be ensured in mandated arbitration required by law?

• That it is conducted by a federal judge.

• That it is cheaper than litigation.

• That it meets constitutional standards and allows for a trial by jury.

• That it is faster than voluntary arbitration.

What is the role of the trial court in a de Novo review of mandated arbitration?

• To automatically uphold the arbitration decision.

• To ensure due process was observed by reviewing the facts.

• To ignore the facts of the arbitration.

• To conduct a new arbitration.

What can parties choose to do after a de Novo review?

• Have the matter tried in court.

• Appeal to the President.

• Request a new arbitrator.

• Dismiss the arbitration results.