Minimum Contact Standard for Personal Jurisdiction - Long Arm Statute

Minimum Contact Standard for Personal Jurisdiction - Long Arm Statute

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video tutorial explains the legal concept of minimum contacts, which determines if an individual has sufficient interaction with a state to justify the state's jurisdiction over them. It emphasizes the importance of fair play and substantial justice in this determination. The court uses a balancing scale to assess whether the individual's activities in the state justify jurisdiction. The tutorial also highlights constitutional protections under the 14th Amendment, ensuring due process rights are not infringed by courts attempting to assert jurisdiction.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary consideration for courts when evaluating minimum contacts?

The individual's financial status

The state's economic interests

The individual's criminal record

Notions of fair play and substantial justice

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How do courts determine if it is fair to subject someone to their jurisdiction?

By reviewing the individual's education level

By considering the state's population

By evaluating the individual's activities in the state

By assessing the individual's intent

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the balancing scale used by courts help to evaluate?

The individual's family background

The level of the individual's activity directed at the state

The individual's financial contributions to the state

The state's legal history

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which amendment provides constitutional protection for due process rights?

The Fourteenth Amendment

The Tenth Amendment

The First Amendment

The Fifth Amendment

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What do constitutional protections prevent courts from doing?

Changing state laws arbitrarily

Infringing on due process rights when executing summons

Appointing judges without elections

Issuing fines without a trial