Court's Voting Rights Act Ruling Could Affect Communities Of Color

Court's Voting Rights Act Ruling Could Affect Communities Of Color

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses changes in voting laws across the U.S., highlighting the role of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in protecting minority voters from discrimination. It examines the potential weakening of Section 2 by the Supreme Court, focusing on a case from Alabama that challenges redistricting practices. The debate centers on whether race should be considered in drawing district maps, with implications for minority representation and legal standards for proving discrimination.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main purpose of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

To require all voting laws to be approved by the Justice Department

To prevent voter discrimination based on race, ethnicity, or language

To expand voting access in all states

To eliminate all forms of voter ID requirements

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How was Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act amended in 1982?

It was amended to address both intent and effect of discrimination

It was expanded to include gender discrimination

It was repealed entirely

It was made more difficult to challenge voting laws

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main argument of the plaintiffs in the Alabama redistricting case?

Alabama's map should have more majority-minority districts

Alabama's map should be approved by the Justice Department

Alabama's map should not consider race at all

Alabama's map should include more rural areas

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What could be a consequence if the Supreme Court sides with Alabama in the redistricting case?

It would require all states to redraw their maps

It would make it harder for minority communities to prove racial discrimination

It would make it easier to prove racial discrimination

It would eliminate the need for redistricting altogether

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What challenge does the potential Supreme Court ruling pose for plaintiffs proving racial discrimination?

They would need to prove discrimination without considering race

They would need to prove intent to discriminate

They would need to prove discrimination in all states

They would need to prove discrimination only in urban areas

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What historical context is considered when discussing the role of race in the Constitution?

The Federalist Papers

The original Bill of Rights

The Reconstruction Amendments

The Articles of Confederation

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the argument of those who support a race-neutral approach to redistricting?

Districts should be drawn based on economic status

Race should not be considered at all in drawing districts

Political lines should be the only consideration

Race should be the primary factor in drawing districts