Fundamentals of Secure Software - Source Code Review

Fundamentals of Secure Software - Source Code Review

Assessment

Interactive Video

Information Technology (IT), Architecture

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video tutorial covers secure code review, emphasizing the importance of involving the right team members, such as developers and security experts. It discusses the integration of threat modeling, risk assessment, and the need for thorough reviews of high-risk code areas. The tutorial also highlights the importance of gathering comprehensive information, using checklists, and timing reviews effectively. It concludes with strategies for addressing vulnerabilities and maintaining compliance with organizational standards.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Who should be involved in a secure code review process?

Only developers

Only security experts

Developers, architects, and security experts

Only project managers

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What should be considered when assessing the risk of a code module?

The color of the code

The programming language used

Ease of exposure and value of loss

The number of lines of code

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is it important to understand the application's architecture during a code review?

To understand applicable security threats

To increase the application's speed

To improve the user interface

To reduce the number of developers needed

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the purpose of using a secure code review checklist?

To ensure all code is written in the same style

To make the code review process faster

To assist in identifying high-risk code areas

To filter out non-applicable categories

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

When is a pre-commit code review performed?

After the code is deployed

Before the code is written

Before the code is merged into the branch

After the code is committed

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What should be done if a vulnerability is found during a pre-commit review?

Document it for future reference

Wait for the next review cycle

Ignore it and proceed

Address it immediately

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential downside of post-commit code reviews?

They are too thorough

They require less communication

They allow faster delivery of software

They may let malicious code into the branch