Leaked Government Document Reveals No Deal Consequences - Brexit Explained

The video discusses Operation Yellowhammer, the UK's contingency plan for a no-deal Brexit. It outlines the emergency planning process, key objectives, and assumptions. The impact of Brexit timing on trade and supply chains is analyzed, highlighting potential disruptions. Government responses and public readiness are examined, with criticism and controversy surrounding the Yellowhammer dossier. The video concludes with a discussion on the implications of a no-deal Brexit.

What is the primary purpose of Operation Yellowhammer?

• To improve trade relations with the EU

• To prepare for emergencies and disruptive challenges

• To negotiate new trade deals

• To enhance military readiness

Which of the following is NOT one of the assumptions made in the Operation Yellowhammer dossier?

• The UK will have preferential access to the European single market

• There will be no bilateral deals between the EU and UK

• EU citizens' rights in the UK will be protected at the point of exit

• There will be a lack of uniformity in business readiness

What is a significant concern regarding the supply of medicines post-Brexit?

• Vulnerability to severe and extended delays

• Increased production costs

• Overproduction

• Lack of demand

How might traffic disruption at UK ports affect fuel supply?

• By causing fuel shortages

• By reducing fuel demand

• By increasing fuel prices

• By holding up fuel trucks

What is expected to happen to UK Nationals' EU citizenship rights post-Brexit?

• They will retain all rights

• Their rights will remain unchanged

• They will lose EU citizenship overnight

• They will gain additional rights

What is a potential social impact of a no-deal Brexit according to the dossier?

• Increased tourism

• Protests and counter-protests

• Higher employment rates

• Improved public services

How did the government of Gibraltar respond to the leaked documents?

• They requested further investigation

• They ignored the report

• They branded the report as out of date and wrong

• They agreed with the findings