PM says ending conversion therapy is ‘complex’ but ministers will ‘stamp it out’

The transcript covers two main topics: a quasi-judicial planning decision and the resignation of LGBT+ advisors over conversion therapy issues. The speaker emphasizes the need to stay out of the planning decision due to its judicial nature. On the topic of conversion therapy, the speaker condemns the practice as repulsive and abhorrent, expressing determination to address the issue despite its complexity. The speaker reassures that steps will be taken to eliminate conversion therapy, acknowledging the advisors' concerns.

What is the nature of the planning decision discussed by the speaker?

• A social decision

• A political decision

• A quasi-judicial decision

• A financial decision

Why does the speaker choose to stay out of the planning decision process?

• They are not interested in the outcome

• They lack the necessary expertise

• It requires careful assessment and is quasi-judicial

• They have other priorities

What issue led to the resignation of several LGBT+ advisors?

• Inaction on gay conversion therapy

• Lack of funding for LGBT+ programs

• Discrimination in the workplace

• Insufficient representation in government

How does the speaker describe the practice of gay conversion therapy?

• Acceptable

• Controversial

• Outdated

• Repulsive and abhorrent

What is the speaker's commitment regarding gay conversion therapy?

• To regulate it

• To ignore it

• To promote it

• To stamp it out