Why do Federal Judges Have Lifetime Appointments? Government Review

The video discusses why federal judges, including Supreme Court judges, have lifetime terms. It explores the role of judges in interpreting the Constitution and the power of judicial review. Historical examples, such as Brown vs. Board, are used to illustrate the importance of judicial independence from public opinion. The democratic process of appointing judges is also examined, questioning whether judges should face voters or continue with lifetime terms.

Why do federal judges receive lifetime appointments?

• To ensure they are not influenced by public opinion

• To allow them to be elected by the public

• To make them accountable to voters

• To limit their power in the judiciary

What is the primary role of the Supreme Court judges?

• To enforce laws

• To interpret the Constitution

• To manage state courts

• To create new laws

How do lifetime terms benefit Supreme Court judges?

• They make judges more popular among the public

• They allow judges to focus on constitutional interpretation without electoral pressure

• They reduce the power of the judiciary

• They ensure judges are frequently re-elected

What democratic process is involved in appointing federal judges?

• Direct election by the public

• Nomination by the president and ratification by the Senate

• Selection by the Supreme Court

• Appointment by state governors

What might change if judges had to face voters?

• The judiciary would become less accountable

• Judges would have lifetime terms

• Judicial decisions might be influenced by public opinion

• Judges would have more independence