Predicting the Higgs Boson

Predicting the Higgs Boson

Assessment

Interactive Video

Physics, Science

11th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video explores how theoretical anomalies in subatomic particle interactions led to the prediction of the Higgs boson. It discusses the concept of particle spin and the constraints of consistent theories, highlighting the unique spins allowed in nature. Quantum mechanical difficulties with W and Z particles are examined, leading to the necessity of a new spin-zero particle, the Higgs boson, to resolve these issues. The video concludes with the theoretical implications and inevitability of the Higgs boson in particle physics.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the key features of elementary particles discussed in the first section?

They are always electrically charged.

They can only exist in pairs.

They possess spin, similar to little tops.

They have a fixed position in space.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why was a new particle necessary according to the second section?

To replace the photon in electromagnetic interactions.

To eliminate the need for spin in particles.

To increase the energy levels of existing particles.

To resolve quantum mechanical difficulties related to weak interactions.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which spin value was identified as the most reasonable for the new particle?

Spin 1

Spin 2

Spin 0

Spin 3/2

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the final section suggest about the Higgs boson?

It was a theoretical necessity despite being unseen before.

It was discovered through experimental anomalies.

It was an unexpected discovery with no theoretical basis.

It was a replacement for the graviton.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the final section describe the principles that led to the prediction of the Higgs boson?

They were focused on eliminating existing particles.

They were based solely on experimental data.

They were constrained enough to predict possibilities beyond observed phenomena.

They were too broad to provide any specific predictions.