Yasmin Khan on the Indian Partition: Drawing the line

Yasmin Khan on the Indian Partition: Drawing the line

Assessment

Interactive Video

History, Social Studies

11th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses Cyril Radcliffe's role in drawing the partition line between India and Pakistan, highlighting his lack of experience and the challenges he faced. It covers the subsequent government policy of population exchange and compares it to post-war Europe. The concept of monocultural states is critiqued, emphasizing the diversity within India and Pakistan and questioning the notion of religious homogeneity.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why was Cyril Radcliffe chosen to draw the boundary line between India and Pakistan?

He volunteered for the task.

He was a renowned cartographer.

He was considered impartial due to his lack of prior involvement with India.

He had extensive knowledge of Indian geography.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was one of the main challenges Radcliffe faced while drawing the boundary?

Pressure from the United Nations.

Frequent changes in the political leadership.

Lack of maps and geographical data.

Conflicting advice from Indian and Pakistani advisors.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What policy did the government implement after the partition?

A policy of military expansion.

A policy of economic integration.

A policy of cultural exchange.

A policy of population exchange.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the video compare the population exchange in India and Pakistan to events in Europe?

It states that the European exchanges were more successful.

It suggests that the Indian context was more peaceful.

It claims that Europe had no such exchanges.

It highlights the use of similar language and concepts.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What critique is made about the idea of creating monocultural states?

It is viewed as impractical due to inherent regional diversity.

It is seen as a successful strategy for peace.

It is praised for its simplicity.

It is considered a necessary step for economic growth.