Australian Defence College's Sussex on Russia, Ukraine

The transcript discusses Putin's true aims in Ukraine, contrasting them with official statements. It examines NATO's response, including economic sanctions and military aid, while avoiding direct conflict. The Russian military's unexpected struggles and potential shift to more aggressive tactics are analyzed. The impact of sanctions on Russia's economy and oligarchs is considered, highlighting vulnerabilities. Finally, the importance of US and NATO credibility in Europe and Asia is emphasized, noting the broader implications for global politics.

What was revealed about Putin's true aims in Ukraine?

• He only wanted to protect Donetsk and Luhansk.

• He wanted to establish a new government in Ukraine.

• He aimed to unite Belarus and Ukraine with Russia.

• He planned to withdraw from Ukraine.

How has NATO responded to the Ukraine conflict?

• By imposing economic sanctions on Russia.

• By deploying troops in Ukraine.

• By supporting Russia's actions.

• By ignoring the conflict.

What is one of the potential threats posed by Russia in the conflict?

• Withdrawal from the United Nations.

• Invasion of Western Europe.

• Nuclear saber-rattling.

• Cyber attacks on NATO countries.

What challenge has Russia faced in its military campaign in Ukraine?

• Internal political unrest.

• Shortage of military equipment.

• Lack of international support.

• Inability to take large Ukrainian cities.

How have economic sanctions affected Russia?

• They have strengthened Russia's economy.

• They have had no impact.

• They have led to increased trade with Europe.

• They have hurt Russian oligarchs and the economy.

What is the significance of the Ukraine conflict for U.S. foreign policy?

• It has no impact on U.S. foreign policy.

• It strengthens U.S. relations with Russia.

• It is a test of U.S. credibility worldwide.

• It leads to U.S. withdrawal from NATO.

What could be the impact of the U.S. failing its security goals in Europe?

• It would have no impact on Asia.

• It would strengthen U.S. alliances in Asia.

• It would undermine U.S. credibility in Asia.

• It would lead to a new alliance with Russia.