India's Opposition Lawmaker Tharoor Discusses New Citizenship Law

The transcript discusses the legal challenges and implications of a controversial law in India, highlighting the tension between majoritarianism and democratic values. It explores the social unrest and economic impact, questioning the government's handling of protests. The Citizenship Act and its exclusion of Muslims are critiqued, with suggestions for a more inclusive asylum policy. The role of the judiciary in reviewing the law's constitutionality is also examined, with concerns about its impartiality.

What is the main concern of those opposing the new citizenship law?

• It enhances technological advancements.

• It promotes international relations.

• It is seen as a betrayal of the freedom struggle.

• It supports economic growth.

How does the social unrest related to the citizenship law affect the economy?

• It boosts investor confidence.

• It has no impact on the economy.

• It leads to a lack of investor confidence.

• It increases foreign investments.

What is suggested as the real agenda behind the new citizenship law?

• To improve international trade.

• To promote secularism.

• To transform India into a Hindu state.

• To enhance technological development.

What is the potential risk associated with the National Register of Citizens?

• It will promote cultural diversity.

• It will enhance educational opportunities.

• It will increase tourism.

• It will disenfranchise large numbers of the Muslim population.

What is the main argument against majoritarianism in a democracy?

• It supports individual rights and equality.

• It allows the majority to do whatever they like.

• It promotes economic growth.

• It enhances technological advancements.

What solution is proposed for handling illegal immigration?

• Deporting all immigrants.

• Building a wall.

• Increasing border security.

• Implementing a refugee and asylum law.

What is the concern regarding the Supreme Court's role in the citizenship law issue?

• It has no authority over the law.

• Its decisions are always impartial.

• Its recent decisions have raised concerns about impartiality.

• It supports the government's agenda.