Paul Nitze Interview (October 26, 1989)

The transcript features a discussion with Nitze on various geopolitical topics, including Gorbachev's proposal for a nuclear-free zone, the importance of NATO, and the changes in the Soviet Union. Nitze reflects on the Cold War, Gorbachev's leadership, and the role of the United States in global security. He also shares personal insights on his career and his book, emphasizing the importance of nonpartisan service and the challenges of political dynamics.

What was the main concern about Gorbachev's nuclear-free zone proposal?

• It was too costly to implement.

• It lacked a clear definition and was similar to a previous rejected proposal.

• It was beneficial for the Soviet Union.

• It was supported by NATO.

Why was the disbandment of NATO considered a bad idea?

• It would weaken the United States' global influence.

• It would increase the power of the Warsaw Pact.

• NATO was essential for balanced disarmament and security.

• It would lead to economic instability.

How did the interviewee describe the current state of the Cold War?

• As completely over.

• As different, with ongoing uncertainties.

• As more intense than before.

• As irrelevant to current politics.

What was the interviewee's view on Gorbachev's leadership?

• He was a democratic leader.

• He was a one-man dictator.

• He was a puppet of the West.

• He was ineffective in his role.

What was the interviewee's stance on supporting Gorbachev's reforms?

• The U.S. should support reforms but not rely solely on Gorbachev.

• The U.S. should fully support Gorbachev.

• The U.S. should oppose all Soviet reforms.

• The U.S. should avoid any involvement.

What was the interviewee's opinion on the movement towards democracy in the Soviet Union?

• It was a threat to global stability.

• It was fully established and functioning.

• It was a facade with limited real change.

• It was unnecessary for Soviet progress.

How did the interviewee view his own career in terms of political partisanship?

• He was strictly aligned with one party.

• He valued non-partisanship for greater freedom.

• He avoided politics entirely.

• He frequently switched parties for personal gain.

What was the interviewee's perspective on the Reagan administration's approach to legislation?

• It was too lenient on opposition parties.

• It focused on international relations over domestic issues.

• It was limited by contempt for the Democratic Party.

• It was highly effective and bipartisan.

Who did the interviewee consider the finest Secretary of State he served under?

• George Shultz

• Henry Kissinger

• Dean Acheson

• James Baker

What was the interviewee's view on the American government's service to its people?

• It was generally effective despite disagreements.

• It was failing in most areas.

• It was only serving the elite.

• It was too focused on foreign policy.