U.S. Troops Will Not Fight in Ukraine: Pentagon's Kirby

The transcript discusses the potential consequences of Russia using weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine, NATO's unified response, and the strategic deterrence posture of the US. It covers the deployment of US troops in Europe, military options for Russia, and the assistance provided to Ukraine. The debate over establishing a no-fly zone and its implications for escalation is also addressed.

What is the main concern when Russia talks about using weapons of mass destruction?

• They have already used them in Ukraine.

• They are accusing others of using them.

• They are preparing to use them.

• They have a history of using them.

What is a key factor in NATO's current strategic discussions?

• Increasing troop presence in Asia

• Reinforcing the eastern flank

• Expanding NATO membership

• Reducing military spending

Why has the US not changed its nuclear strategic deterrent posture?

• They are confident in their current posture.

• There is no immediate threat.

• They have increased their nuclear arsenal.

• They are waiting for NATO's decision.

What is the best military option for Russia according to the transcript?

• Withdraw from NATO

• Deploy more troops

• Increase offensive operations

• Negotiate with Ukraine

What type of military assistance is the US providing to Ukraine?

• Air defense systems

• Long-range missiles

• Naval ships

• Nuclear weapons

Why is the US cautious about providing fixed-wing aircraft to Ukraine?

• They are not effective in combat.

• They are too expensive.

• Ukraine does not need them.

• It could be seen as escalatory.

What is the US's stance on implementing a no-fly zone over Ukraine?

• They support it fully.

• They are considering it.

• They have already implemented it.

• They believe it would be escalatory.