The transcript discusses the challenges and risks associated with electronic and internet voting systems, highlighting issues such as lack of verification and potential security vulnerabilities. It contrasts these with paper ballot systems, which allow for recounts and verification. The discussion includes examples from Estonia and the 2000 US election, emphasizing the need for secure and reliable voting technologies.

What is a major drawback of paperless voting machines?

• They are more expensive to maintain.

• They do not provide a way to verify if votes are recorded accurately.

• They are slower than paper-based systems.

• They require more technical expertise to operate.

Why is internet voting currently not recommended?

• It requires special equipment that is not widely available.

• It is not popular among voters.

• There is no way to verify that the vote sent is the vote received.

• It is too expensive to implement.

What was a significant issue in the 2000 Florida election?

• The lack of voter turnout.

• The use of a faulty technology that led to uncounted votes.

• The presence of software bugs in voting machines.

• The use of outdated paper ballots.

What is a common misconception about transitioning to paper ballot systems?

• It is more expensive than maintaining old machines.

• It is less secure than electronic systems.

• It takes longer to count votes.

• It requires more training for poll workers.

What change has Citizens United brought to elections?

• It has increased the use of electronic voting machines.

• It has reduced the number of polling places.

• It has allowed for large corporate contributions.

• It has made it easier for people to vote.

What is a potential consequence of using certain voting technologies?

• Increased voter turnout.

• Voter disenfranchisement due to incorrect vote recording.

• More accurate vote counts.

• Faster election results.

What is a concern with voting systems that lack a paper trail?

• They are more expensive to operate.

• They require more technical support.

• They are more prone to hacking.

• They cannot be audited for accuracy.