Qualcomm Says Apple Needs to Take China IPhone Ban Seriously

The transcript discusses a legal case involving Apple and Qualcomm, focusing on a preliminary injunction affecting older iPhone models in China. Qualcomm's CEO, Steve Mullen, expresses hope for a resolution with Apple, either through court rulings or settlement. The impact of the US-China trade war on the case is considered, though the court's decision predates significant trade events. Additionally, Qualcomm is involved in an antitrust case with the FTC, with ongoing settlement talks and a potential trial in January.

What was the immediate effect of the preliminary injunction on Apple's sales in China?

• It required Apple to stop selling certain iPhone models.

• It allowed Apple to sell more new models.

• It boosted sales of older iPhone models.

• It had no impact on Apple's sales.

What is the potential benefit of Qualcomm working with Apple, according to CEO Steve Mullen?

• It would combine technology and product leadership in mobile.

• It would reduce legal costs.

• It would enhance Qualcomm's market share.

• It would eliminate competition.

How do Apple and Qualcomm plan to resolve their disputes?

• Through a merger of the two companies.

• By ignoring the legal issues.

• By continuing the litigation indefinitely.

• Through court rulings or settlement processes.

What has been the impact of the US-China trade war on the Apple-Qualcomm legal proceedings?

• It has accelerated the resolution process.

• It is difficult to determine the exact impact.

• It has had no impact whatsoever.

• It has directly influenced the court's decisions.

What is Qualcomm's stance on the antitrust case brought by the FTC?

• They are planning to merge with the FTC.

• They believe the case is unfounded and are prepared to defend themselves.

• They are ignoring the case entirely.

• They have admitted to the charges and are seeking a settlement.

What is Qualcomm's main argument in the case against Apple's contract manufacturers?

• The manufacturers have stolen Qualcomm's technology.

• The manufacturers have refused to produce Qualcomm's products.

• The manufacturers have overpaid Qualcomm.

• The manufacturers have breached their agreement by not paying royalties.

What is the scheduled timeline for the FTC case to go to trial if not settled?

• In December

• In January

• In February

• In March