Amazon Is Extorting NY Over HQ2, State Senator Gianaris Says

The transcript discusses the controversy surrounding Amazon's HQ2 in New York, focusing on the $3 billion subsidy demand and its implications for economic development. The speaker argues against corporate welfare and highlights the need for responsible corporate behavior. Public opinion is against the subsidies, and the speaker emphasizes the importance of public involvement in such decisions. The discussion also touches on the broader issue of corporate influence on government policies.

What is the speaker's main criticism of Amazon's approach to establishing HQ2 in New York?

• Amazon is not transparent about its plans.

• Amazon is not creating enough jobs.

• Amazon is demanding excessive subsidies.

• Amazon is not considering other cities.

How does the speaker compare Amazon's approach to Google's?

• Google demands more subsidies than Amazon.

• Google has a similar approach to Amazon.

• Google is not interested in New York.

• Google brings jobs with minimal subsidies.

What does the speaker suggest about the influence of corporations on government policies?

• Corporations are reducing their influence on policies.

• Corporations are increasingly dictating government policies.

• Corporations have no influence on government policies.

• Government policies are independent of corporate interests.

What does the speaker believe is necessary for Amazon to change its approach?

• Amazon should act as a responsible corporate citizen.

• Amazon should reduce the number of jobs offered.

• Amazon should focus on other states.

• Amazon should increase its subsidies.

What is the speaker's view on the potential job growth from Amazon's HQ2 in New York?

• It will significantly alter the city's job market.

• It is a small percentage of the city's normal job growth.

• It will not create any new jobs.

• It will double the city's job growth.

What does the speaker suggest could have led to a different outcome in the Amazon HQ2 decision?

• A reduction in job offers.

• A larger subsidy offer.

• A focus on other cities.

• A more open and public process.

What is the speaker's stance on the $3 billion subsidy for Amazon?

• It is justified and necessary.

• It is an example of corporate welfare.

• It is too small to make a difference.

• It is a standard practice for all companies.