DUP Will Not Be Backing May's Brexit Deal, Foster Says

The transcript discusses ongoing Brexit negotiations, focusing on the DUP's stance on Theresa May's deal, the Morrison amendment, and the potential outcomes if May loses the vote. It explores the implications of extending Article 50 and the possibility of a no confidence vote. The discussion also covers the potential consequences of a no deal Brexit, emphasizing the need for a balanced agreement that benefits both the UK and the EU.

What is the main reason the DUP opposes Theresa May's Brexit deal?

• It proposes a hard border between Ireland and Northern Ireland.

• It does not include a trade agreement with the EU.

• It requires the UK to remain in the EU indefinitely.

• It includes a backstop that treats Northern Ireland differently.

What is the Morrison amendment related to?

• Setting an end date for the backstop.

• Extending Article 50 indefinitely.

• Creating a new trade agreement with the EU.

• Removing the backstop entirely.

What might strengthen Theresa May's position in negotiations with the EU if she loses the vote?

• A comprehensive defeat in the House of Commons.

• An extension of Article 50.

• A narrow victory in the House of Commons.

• Support from the DUP.

Why is the DUP against extending Article 50?

• It prolongs negotiations unnecessarily.

• It would strengthen the EU's position.

• It would require a second referendum.

• It would lead to a no-deal Brexit.

Under what circumstances might the DUP consider voting against the government?

• If the government fails to deliver a satisfactory Brexit deal.

• If Jeremy Corbyn becomes Prime Minister.

• If Article 50 is extended indefinitely.

• If a second referendum is called.

What is the DUP's view on a no-deal Brexit?

• They are indifferent to the possibility.

• They believe it is not a desirable outcome.

• They fully support a no-deal Brexit.

• They think it would be beneficial for Northern Ireland.

What does the DUP believe about the forecasts made regarding not joining the euro?

• They were underestimated and harmful.

• They were accurate and beneficial.

• They were exaggerated and did not materialize.

• They were irrelevant to the current situation.