Fiorina: Corporate Silence Over Trump No Longer An Option

The transcript discusses the response of corporate America and tech companies to recent political events, emphasizing the need for businesses to take a stand. It highlights the risks and consequences of political silence and the actions taken by companies like Amazon and Apple. The discussion also covers the accountability of political figures, particularly within the Republican Party, and the potential impact on Trump's businesses and brand.

What is the main reason corporate America must respond to political events, according to the transcript?

• To gain political favor

• Because silence is seen as agreement

• To avoid legal issues

• To increase profits

What is a potential downside for businesses that choose to call out political figures by name?

• Inciting the wrath of the Republican Party

• Higher operational costs

• Increased taxation

• Loss of customer trust

Why did Amazon and Apple take action against Parler?

• To increase their market share

• To comply with government regulations

• To reduce competition

• To make a stance on platform responsibility

What is suggested as necessary for technology companies to manage their platforms effectively?

• Creating transparent rules of the road

• Increasing advertising

• Hiring more employees

• Reducing platform features

What is the suggested solution for the Republican Party to move forward after recent events?

• Excise Trump from the party

• Increase campaign contributions

• Focus on economic policies

• Strengthen ties with tech companies

What impact did recent events have on Trump's business ventures?

• No significant impact

• Expansion into new markets

• Brand became toxic

• Increased brand value

What challenge might Trump's children face in the future?

• Increased business opportunities

• Legal challenges

• Lack of political support

• Difficulty escaping past images and recordings