Eve Pearlman: How to lead a conversation between people who disagree

The video discusses the rise of polarization and the concept of dialogue journalism, which aims to bridge divides by fostering conversations between opposing sides. It highlights a project that brought together Trump and Clinton supporters to engage in moderated discussions. The project revealed that genuine dialogue is possible and beneficial, leading to lasting connections. The video emphasizes the importance of transparency, curiosity, and respectful engagement in journalism to support democracy.

What was the main goal of introducing 'dialogue journalism'?

• To bridge social and political divides

• To promote a specific political agenda

• To increase newspaper sales

• To entertain the audience

In the initial project, which two groups were brought together for dialogue?

• Students and teachers from different states

• Environmentalists and industrialists

• Trump supporters from Alabama and Clinton supporters from California

• Republicans and Democrats from New York

What was a key method used to initiate conversations in the dialogue journalism project?

• Asking participants to share stereotypes they believe others hold about them

• Organizing a group outing

• Conducting a debate competition

• Providing a list of discussion topics

What did the dialogue journalism approach reveal about the possibility of real dialogue?

• It is impossible due to deep-seated biases

• It is possible with the right structure and support

• It only works in small groups

• It requires a lot of funding

How do journalists support dialogue in this approach?

• By avoiding controversial topics

• By taking sides in the conversation

• By providing biased information

• By moderating and facilitating respectful exchanges

What is emphasized as essential for genuine communication?

• Avoiding difficult topics

• Winning arguments

• Using snark and humor

• Practicing empathy and curiosity

What lasting impact did the dialogue journalism project have on participants?

• They only communicated through social media

• They became more politically divided

• They formed lasting friendships across political lines

• They stopped engaging in political discussions