Former U.S. Energy Sec. Moniz on Oil Prices, Iran, Climate

Ernest Moniz discusses his role in advancing energy technology and the Iran nuclear agreement. He addresses the impact of reimposed Iran sanctions on the oil market and the challenges in predicting oil prices. Moniz highlights the bipartisan support for clean energy in the US but notes the difficulty in enacting major policy changes due to congressional gridlock. He emphasizes the importance of state-level actions and the role of business in pursuing a low-carbon future. Moniz also shares insights from his work in Europe, focusing on clean energy and climate change initiatives.

What role did Ernest Moniz play in the Iran nuclear agreement?

• He criticized the agreement publicly.

• He was unaware of the agreement.

• He played a pivotal role in negotiating it.

• He opposed the agreement.

How do the Iran sanctions affect the oil market?

• They create uncertainty and affect reserve capacity.

• They stabilize the oil market.

• They have no impact on the oil market.

• They lead to a decrease in oil prices.

What is the likelihood of a major energy policy change in the US in the next couple of years?

• Unlikely

• Already happening

• Guaranteed

• Very likely

What is the significance of the bipartisan consensus mentioned by Moniz?

• It has no impact on energy policy.

• It hinders clean energy technology innovation.

• It supports the advancement of clean energy technology.

• It opposes any form of energy innovation.

What is Ernest Moniz's focus during his visit to Europe?

• Focusing on clean energy and climate change

• Promoting tourism

• Discussing military strategies

• Negotiating trade agreements

How does the business community view the transition to a low-carbon future?

• They are indifferent.

• They are against it.

• They believe it is unnecessary.

• They recognize it and seek stability for planning.

What role do local governments and businesses play in the US's low-carbon future?

• They are irrelevant.

• They are crucial in continuing the low-carbon agenda.

• They oppose the low-carbon agenda.

• They have no influence.