CLEAN : Dutch react after tribunal says anti-Covid curfew must be lifted

The video discusses a judge's decision to lift a curfew, which has led to public happiness. The speaker shares personal views, emphasizing the importance of government decisions in controlling virus spread. The role of the tribunal versus the government is debated, highlighting a potential mistake in the curfew's legal process.

What was the public's reaction to the judge's decision on the curfew?

• They were unhappy.

• They were indifferent.

• They were happy.

• They were confused.

What does the speaker believe is important in controlling the virus spread?

• Relying on personal opinions.

• Following government decisions.

• Waiting for the virus to disappear.

• Ignoring government guidelines.

Why does the speaker think the government should handle the curfew decision?

• Because the public demands it.

• Because the tribunal is not related.

• Because the virus is not serious.

• Because the curfew is unnecessary.

What unusual legal process occurred in France regarding the curfew?

• The curfew was extended without reason.

• A large protest led to the decision.

• A small group filed a complaint that was approved.

• The government decided without any legal input.

What does the speaker suggest about the government's role in the curfew process?

• The government was too strict.

• The government was uninvolved.

• The government made a mistake.

• The government acted perfectly.