What We Do And Don't Know About The U.S. Spy Extracted From Russia

The transcript discusses the extraction of a high-ranking intelligence source from Russia, reportedly due to concerns over the Trump administration's handling of classified information. The CIA disputes this timeline. Russian media identified the alleged spy, but the government claims he was not high-ranking. Media outlets report conflicting information about the spy's current location, with NBC claiming he is in Washington DC. The CIA confirms the source is no longer providing intelligence on the Kremlin.

What was the reason given for the extraction of the intelligence source from Russia?

• The source voluntarily left Russia.

• The source was discovered by the CIA.

• The source was compromised by Russian officials.

• The Trump administration mishandled classified information.

How did the CIA respond to CNN's timeline of events regarding the extraction?

• They supported CNN's report.

• They confirmed the timeline.

• They denied the timeline as inaccurate.

• They refused to comment.

What did the Russian government say about the alleged spy's position?

• He had direct access to President Putin.

• He was a double agent.

• He was a high-ranking official.

• He was not a high-ranking official.

Which news outlet claimed to know the exact location of the former spy?

• NBC

• The New York Times

• Newsy

• CNN

What is the consistent fact across all reports about the CIA's asset?

• The asset has been relocated to Europe.

• The asset is no longer a source of intelligence.

• The asset was never in Russia.

• The asset is still providing intelligence.