Nissan Said to Conduct Faulty Quality Checks Since 1979

The transcript discusses the impact of a longstanding malpractice scandal on Nissan's corporate image and domestic sales, highlighting Japanese consumer sensitivity to such issues. It explores the responsibility of current management and potential consequences, noting that the scandal is more procedural than product-related. The discussion extends to the broader Japanese auto industry, mentioning Subaru's similar issues and emphasizing the need for improved compliance among automakers.

How might Nissan's corporate image be affected by the malpractice?

• It will improve significantly.

• It could be damaged, affecting domestic sales.

• It will remain unchanged.

• It will only affect overseas sales.

Who is likely to take responsibility for the malpractice at Nissan?

• The marketing department.

• Someone from the current management, especially in manufacturing.

• A couple of veteran executives.

• The entire board of directors.

What is the main challenge in addressing the malpractice issue at Nissan?

• Reducing production costs.

• Improving car design.

• Pinpointing blame on specific individuals.

• Finding new markets for their cars.

What other company is mentioned as having similar issues to Nissan?

• Mazda

• Subaru

• Honda

• Toyota

What does the scandal reveal about the Japanese auto industry?

• A need for better marketing strategies.

• A compliance issue more about paperwork than product quality.

• A decline in car safety standards.

• An increase in production costs.