Breyer Says Supreme Court Justices All Get Along

The transcript discusses the ideological differences and debates between the speaker and Justice Scalia, highlighting their friendship despite differing views. It emphasizes the professionalism and respectful conduct within the Supreme Court, contrasting it with past instances of intolerance. The speaker shares anecdotes to illustrate the importance of listening and understanding differing perspectives.

What was the nature of the relationship between the speaker and Justice Scalia?

• They were adversaries with no personal connection.

• They agreed on most judicial matters.

• They were friends despite ideological differences.

• They never interacted with each other.

What analogy did Justice Scalia use to describe his judicial philosophy?

• A debate between two philosophers.

• A negotiation between two diplomats.

• A race between two hunters and a bear.

• A chess game between two grandmasters.

How does the speaker describe the atmosphere in the Supreme Court conference room?

• Contentious and hostile.

• Calm and professional.

• Indifferent and detached.

• Chaotic and disorganized.

What historical example does the speaker use to illustrate past prejudice in the Supreme Court?

• A justice resigning due to political pressure.

• A justice being impeached for misconduct.

• A justice refusing to speak to another due to religious differences.

• A justice being appointed without proper qualifications.

According to the speaker, what is crucial for effective communication in the Supreme Court?

• Listening and contributing thoughtfully.

• Avoiding all forms of debate.

• Raising one's voice to be heard.

• Ignoring opposing viewpoints.