CLEAN : South African breeders ask court to end rhino horn trade ban

The video discusses the complexities of rhino horn trade in South Africa, highlighting the irony of legal hunting versus illegal horn harvesting. It argues for sustainable horn harvesting as a humane alternative to poaching, critiquing the ineffectiveness of the 30-year trade ban. The potential benefits of legalizing the trade are explored, suggesting it could aid in species conservation. A multifaceted approach to conservation is emphasized, noting that legalization is just one overlooked strategy among many.

What is the legal paradox regarding rhino horn trade in South Africa?

• It is illegal to kill rhinos and export their horns.

• It is legal to kill rhinos and export their horns, but illegal to keep them alive and do the same.

• It is legal to keep rhinos alive and export their horns.

• It is illegal to export rhino horns to any country.

Why is rhino horn considered a sustainable product?

• Because it can be harvested without harming the animal.

• Because it is a renewable resource that grows back.

• Because it is not in demand.

• Because it is easy to transport.

What is one proposed benefit of sustainably harvesting rhino horn?

• It will make rhino horns more expensive.

• It will lead to the extinction of rhinos.

• It will increase the demand for rhino horns.

• It will help reduce poaching by providing a legal supply.

What has been the impact of the 30-year ban on rhino horn trade?

• It has successfully conserved the rhino population.

• It has led to the extinction of rhinos in Asia.

• It has been ineffective in preventing the decline of rhino populations.

• It has increased the illegal trade of elephant tusks.

What is suggested as a part of a multifaceted program to conserve rhinos?

• Continuing the ban on rhino horn trade.

• Implementing a single strategy focused on habitat protection.

• Focusing solely on anti-poaching efforts.

• Lifting the moratorium on rhino horn trade as part of a broader strategy.