The Queen snubs Nick Griffin

The transcript discusses a garden party where Nick Griffin was notably absent. Griffin, backed by a million British voters, was excluded at the last minute due to claims of using the event for political purposes. He expressed his discontent through media and blog posts, criticizing the inconsistency in rules application. Public opinion was divided, with some supporting his attendance and others indifferent. Royal commentators noted the controversy, suggesting the palace should have withdrawn the invitation earlier to avoid political exploitation. Despite his absence, Griffin's situation drew significant media attention.

What was Nick Griffin's main argument for attending the garden party?

• He was personally invited by the Queen.

• He had the support of a million British voters.

• He wanted to promote his new book.

• He was a close friend of the royal family.

Why was Nick Griffin's invitation to the garden party withdrawn?

• He declined the invitation himself.

• He was not a British citizen.

• He was accused of using it for political purposes.

• He was involved in a scandal.

What was the general public opinion about Nick Griffin's attendance at the party?

• Most people were indifferent.

• Everyone agreed with the palace's decision.

• The public was unaware of the situation.

• Many believed he should have been allowed to attend.

What dilemma did the palace face regarding the invitation?

• Whether to withdraw the invitation after political use.

• Whether to allow media coverage.

• Whether to change the venue of the party.

• Whether to invite more politicians.

How did Nick Griffin's absence potentially embarrass the Queen?

• It led to a decrease in attendance.

• It highlighted a lack of security at the event.

• It caused a delay in the event schedule.

• It drew media attention to the controversy.