Starmer says it was 'humiliating' for government to steal Labour's non-dom tax policy

Starmer says it was 'humiliating' for government to steal Labour's non-dom tax policy

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript covers a discussion on the future headquarters of HSBC and the abolition of the non-Dom tax status. It highlights Labour's fiscal commitments, particularly to the NHS, and contrasts them with the government's unfunded commitments. The conversation critiques the government's budget, especially the £46 billion unfunded commitment to abolish National Insurance, and discusses the role of migration in economic growth. The transcript concludes with a discussion on Michelle Donnellan's legal bill and the need for government accountability.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the Labour Party's stance on the non-Dom tax status?

They have no opinion.

They want to increase it.

They support it.

They want to abolish it.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How does the Labour Party plan to ensure economic stability?

By reducing public sector investment.

By relying on migration.

By increasing taxes.

By implementing tight fiscal rules.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the Labour Party's view on the government's use of migration for economic growth?

They oppose it completely.

They believe it should be the only strategy.

They think it should be part of a broader plan.

They fully support it.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What issue does the Labour Party highlight regarding a government minister's legal expenses?

The expenses were too low.

The expenses were covered by taxpayers.

The expenses were justified.

The expenses were paid by the minister.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What promise does the Labour Party make regarding accountability in government spending?

They will increase spending without oversight.

They will allow ministers to use public funds for personal expenses.

They will reduce transparency in spending.

They will prevent misuse of taxpayer money.