False Imprisonment - Tort

The video tutorial explains false imprisonment, which occurs when an individual is confined without justification and believes they cannot leave. It highlights that physical barriers are not necessary; the mere presence of a threat can suffice. The tutorial uses shoplifting scenarios to illustrate how businesses might inadvertently commit false imprisonment. It concludes by discussing the legal implications and potential for tort action if the confinement is unjustified.

What is a key element of false imprisonment?

• The person must be tied up.

• The person must be physically harmed.

• The person must believe they cannot leave.

• The person must be physically locked in a room.

In false imprisonment, what is not necessary for confinement?

• A verbal threat

• A physical barrier

• A written contract

• A locked door

When is it not considered false imprisonment?

• When the person is threatened with harm.

• When the person consents to stay.

• When the person is physically restrained.

• When the person is unaware of their confinement.

What might a person believe to be considered falsely imprisoned?

• They will receive a reward if they stay.

• They will suffer harm if they leave.

• They will be ignored if they leave.

• They will be praised if they stay.

In a shoplifting scenario, when can false imprisonment occur?

• When the store offers a discount to the person.

• When the store detains someone without justification.

• When the store has proof of theft.

• When the store calls the police immediately.