Former Hong Kong Leader Jailed for 20 Months

The video discusses a legal case involving Donald Junk, who was found guilty of misconduct related to a non-disclosed rental agreement for a luxury apartment in Shenzhen. The apartment was linked to a businessman seeking a digital broadcast license in Hong Kong. Junk was also involved in recommending an architect for an award without disclosing a conflict of interest, but was found not guilty of this charge. A retrial is pending for a bribery charge related to the apartment's refurbishment, as the jury could not reach a verdict.

What was the main reason for the guilty verdict related to the apartment in Shenzhen?

• The apartment was not paid for.

• The apartment was used for illegal activities.

• The accused did not disclose his relationship with the businessman.

• The apartment was illegally constructed.

Why was the accused found not guilty of the charge related to the award recommendation?

• He did not disclose their work on his apartment.

• The recommendation was not related to the apartment.

• The architect and designer were not qualified.

• The award was never given.

What was the nature of the charge that resulted in a retrial?

• Fraud

• Bribery

• Money laundering

• Tax evasion

What was the jury's decision on the bribery charge?

• Guilty

• Dismissed

• Not guilty

• Undecided

Who was potentially funding the refurbishment of the apartment?

• The businessman with pending matters

• A local charity

• The accused himself

• The government