What 9/11 Would Look Like In Today's Social Media Fueled World

The transcript discusses how social media would have altered the way news about the 9/11 attacks was consumed, highlighting the potential for real-time updates and graphic content. It also examines the Taliban's current use of social media to spread its message and the challenges platforms like Facebook and Twitter face in moderating such content. The discussion includes insights from Instagram's head on their policies against the Taliban and the pressure on social media companies to manage terrorist messaging.

How might social media have altered the way people received news during significant events like 9/11?

• By focusing solely on traditional media

• By providing more personal interactions

• By offering real-time updates and graphic footage

• By reducing the amount of information available

What is the stance of Instagram and Facebook regarding the Taliban's presence on their platforms?

• They do not allow any presence or promotion

• They have no specific policy

• They allow limited presence

• They encourage open dialogue

What is a key difference between Facebook and Twitter's approach to the Taliban?

• Twitter has banned the Taliban, while Facebook has not

• Both have banned the Taliban

• Neither has any restrictions on the Taliban

• Facebook has banned the Taliban, while Twitter has not

What challenge do social media platforms face with the Taliban's return to power?

• Expanding their user base

• Increasing user engagement

• Managing terrorist messaging

• Developing new features

How are sympathizers of the Taliban using social media despite restrictions?

• By using encrypted messaging apps

• By avoiding social media altogether

• By creating new platforms

• By spreading their message on existing platforms