Suu Kyi’s Huge Popularity Poses Threat to Myanmar’s Generals

The transcript discusses the verification of Myanmar's November election results by independent bodies and the military's efforts to maintain power. It highlights the historical context of political power dynamics in Myanmar, focusing on the military's concern over potential constitutional changes that could dilute their influence. The discussion also covers the impact and effectiveness of international sanctions, particularly those imposed by the US, and their potential effects on the wider population.

What was the primary concern of the military regarding the November election results?

• The election results were not valid.

• International bodies did not verify the results.

• Aung San Suu Kyi's popularity could lead to constitutional changes.

• The election was not free and fair.

What historical event is highlighted in the context of Myanmar's political landscape?

• The international community's intervention in 1990.

• The military's acceptance of election results in 1990.

• Aung San Suu Kyi's party winning a landslide election in 1990.

• The drafting of a new constitution in 1990.

What is the military's strategy to prevent similar election outcomes in the future?

• Banning Aung San Suu Kyi completely.

• Allowing free and fair elections.

• Increasing international cooperation.

• Reducing military influence in politics.

Why are additional sanctions against Myanmar's military considered unlikely to be effective?

• The military leaders are already under sanctions.

• The sanctions would benefit the military.

• The sanctions would strengthen the military's power.

• The sanctions would not affect the wider public.

What is the US's approach to aid in Myanmar amidst the political situation?

• Completely withdrawing all aid.

• Providing aid only to the military.

• Continuing health programs while reviewing other aid.

• Increasing military aid.