Nigel Farage on possible long Brexit extension

The transcript discusses the challenges faced by the UK Parliament and the Prime Minister in handling Brexit. It highlights the Parliament's reluctance to accept a no-deal Brexit and critiques the Prime Minister for not being straightforward about her stance. The discussion also touches on the European Union's history of handling referendums and its potential satisfaction with a long extension to the Brexit process.

What was the main challenge for the Prime Minister in dealing with Parliament regarding Brexit?

• Parliament had no interest in Brexit negotiations.

• Parliament was largely in favor of a no-deal Brexit.

• Parliament was divided on the issue of Brexit.

• Parliament was mostly against a no-deal Brexit.

What was the criticism of the Prime Minister's approach to Brexit negotiations?

• She was too aggressive in her negotiations.

• She was not clear about her stance on a no-deal Brexit.

• She refused to negotiate with the European Union.

• She prioritized a no-deal Brexit over any agreement.

How did the Prime Minister's new European treaty compare to remaining in the EU?

• It was considered better than remaining in the EU.

• It was seen as equivalent to remaining in the EU.

• It was viewed as worse than remaining in the EU.

• It was not compared to remaining in the EU.

What is the European Union's historical approach to unfavorable referendum results?

• They impose sanctions on the country.

• They often push for a second referendum.

• They accept the results without question.

• They ignore the results entirely.

What might the European Union's reaction be to a long extension of the Brexit process?

• They would be very pleased.

• They would be indifferent.

• They would be confused.

• They would be very unhappy.