Horsemeat May Have Been Used In Burgers for Over a Year

The transcript discusses the tracing of horsemeat contamination to a Polish supplier, which mixed beef and horse off-cuts for burgers. The contamination may have persisted for a year, prompting investigations. ABP apologized and implemented tests, while Tesco terminated its contract due to trust issues. The scandal affected consumer trust and market dynamics, with some farmers advocating for quality meat. Authorities confirmed the safety of contaminated burgers but did not rule out legal actions for food fraud.

What was the primary concern regarding the Polish supplier involved in the horsemeat contamination?

• They were mixing horse and beef off-cuts.

• They were overcharging for their products.

• They were not delivering on time.

• They were using expired meat.

Why did Tescos decide to sever its contract with the supplier?

• The supplier was too expensive.

• The supplier refused to provide samples.

• The supplier breached trust by using unapproved sources.

• The supplier was located too far away.

What action did the parent company ABP take in response to the contamination issue?

• They apologized and implemented tests to verify meat origins.

• They increased prices.

• They sued the Polish supplier.

• They closed down the processing plant.

How did some farmers view the potential impact of the contamination scandal on the beef market?

• They believed it would increase trust in the food chain.

• They thought it would encourage consumers to buy cheaper meat.

• They expected it to have no impact at all.

• They hoped it would lead to a preference for quality meat.

What was the authorities' stance on the safety of the contaminated burgers?

• They recommended immediate disposal.

• They declared them unsafe to eat.

• They insisted they were safe to eat but considered prosecutions for food fraud.

• They suggested cooking them at higher temperatures.