CLEAN : Leave and Remain voters react to new Brexit deal

The transcript discusses the inadequacy of the current deal, emphasizing that it is not beneficial and advocating for a straightforward approach similar to the original referendum. It highlights the challenges faced by Parliament in approving the deal and the necessity for an extension to allow proper analysis, ultimately suggesting that the deal, like previous ones, may be rejected.

What is the speaker's opinion on the deal mentioned in the first section?

• They believe it is well-constructed and beneficial.

• They think it is hastily assembled and unsatisfactory.

• They are indifferent about the deal.

• They think it is better than remaining in the EU.

In the second section, what does the speaker suggest about the Brexit process?

• It should include multiple deals.

• It should involve complex negotiations.

• It should be as simple as the original referendum.

• It should be delayed indefinitely.

What is the speaker's view on the current deal's chances in Parliament?

• They are confident it will be accepted.

• They think it will be postponed indefinitely.

• They think it will be rejected like previous deals.

• They believe it will pass easily.

According to the speaker, what is necessary for the deal to be properly analyzed?

• An extension of the deadline.

• A public vote.

• A complete rewrite of the deal.

• Immediate approval by Parliament.

What does the speaker compare the current deal to in terms of its potential outcome?

• A new proposal that is yet to be discussed.

• A previous deal that was rejected.

• A previous deal that was accepted.

• A successful negotiation.