CLEAN : South Africa debates legalisation of rhino trade

The video discusses the regulation of rhino horn trade, emphasizing community involvement and the perception of rhino horn's effectiveness. It highlights the demand for such products and suggests that a controlled legal supply could reduce poaching pressure. The video also examines Swaziland's legal framework, which has effectively curbed poaching, and debates the potential benefits of a regulated trade system.

What is the perceived benefit of providing a controlled legal supply of rhino horn?

• It will reduce the intrigue around the product.

• It will eliminate the need for beauty products.

• It will make rhino horn more expensive.

• It will increase the demand for rhino horn.

How does the sale process of rhino horn affect the revenue received by the community?

• The community receives no revenue from the sales.

• The community receives a fixed amount regardless of sales.

• Middlemen and taxation reduce the community's share.

• The community receives a large percentage of the sale price.

What is the primary motivation behind the controlled supply of rhino horn?

• To make a profit from the sales.

• To save rhinos by reducing poaching pressure.

• To increase the number of middlemen.

• To promote international pharmaceutical products.

What legal measure does Swaziland have in place to prevent poaching?

• A ban on all animal products.

• A reward system for reporting poachers.

• A 10-year sentence and refund of the animal's value.

• A fine for poaching.

What is necessary for considering the trade of rhino horn according to the final section?

• A vague proposal with no details.

• A clear, structured proposal detailing the trade process.

• An increase in demand without regulation.

• A complete ban on rhino horn trade.