The video discusses the regulation of rhino horn trade, emphasizing community involvement and the perception of rhino horn's effectiveness. It highlights the demand for such products and suggests that a controlled legal supply could reduce poaching pressure. The video also examines Swaziland's legal framework, which has effectively curbed poaching, and debates the potential benefits of a regulated trade system.

What is the perceived benefit of providing a controlled legal supply of rhino horn?

• It will reduce the intrigue around the product.

• It will eliminate the need for beauty products.

• It will make rhino horn more expensive.

• It will increase the demand for rhino horn.

How does the sale process of rhino horn affect the revenue received by the community?

• The community receives no revenue from the sales.

• The community receives a fixed amount regardless of sales.

• Middlemen and taxation reduce the community's share.

• The community receives a large percentage of the sale price.

What is the primary motivation behind the controlled supply of rhino horn?

• To make a profit from the sales.

• To save rhinos by reducing poaching pressure.

• To increase the number of middlemen.

• To promote international pharmaceutical products.

What legal measure does Swaziland have in place to prevent poaching?

• A ban on all animal products.

• A reward system for reporting poachers.

• A 10-year sentence and refund of the animal's value.

• A fine for poaching.

What is necessary for considering the trade of rhino horn according to the final section?

• A vague proposal with no details.

• A clear, structured proposal detailing the trade process.

• An increase in demand without regulation.

• A complete ban on rhino horn trade.