VOICED : Tiny Michigan town in water fight with Nestle

Mary Ann, a resident of Osceola Township, MI, is concerned about the drying creek behind her garden, attributing it to Nestle's water extraction activities over the past 17 years. Nestle seeks to expand its operations, causing local residents to take legal action, fearing environmental damage. Nestle defends its actions with scientific studies, claiming no harm to local streams. The economic impact is mixed, with some communities benefiting from Nestle's presence, while others criticize the minimal compensation for water extraction.

What is Mary Ann's main concern regarding the creek behind her garden?

• The creek is drying up.

• The creek is flooding frequently.

• The creek is becoming polluted.

• The creek is attracting too many tourists.

What action has Osceola Township taken against Nestle?

• They have increased water extraction fees.

• They have taken Nestle to court.

• They have ignored Nestle's activities.

• They have partnered with Nestle for economic benefits.

What does Nestle claim supports their water extraction activities?

• Local community support.

• Government subsidies.

• Scientific studies they funded.

• Environmental impact assessments.

How has the city of Evart benefited from Nestle's operations?

• Improved public transportation.

• Lower water rates and maintained wells.

• Increased tourism.

• Higher employment in agriculture.

What is the fee Nestle pays to Michigan for extracting over 130 million gallons of water annually?

• $200,000

• $2,000

• $20,000

• $200