Dunn family answers questions from press

The transcript discusses the importance and timing of a heartfelt apology in a sensitive situation. It explores whether an apology is sufficient or if legal action is necessary. The speaker reflects on the intentions behind actions and the impact of delayed apologies on the affected family. The discussion emphasizes the short window of opportunity for an apology to be meaningful and the family's disappointment with the delay.

What does the speaker initially question about the apology?

• Whether it was sincere

• If it was delivered on time

• If it would be enough or if court action is needed

• Whether it was written or verbal

How does the speaker describe the incident involving Harry?

• A minor mistake

• An intentional act

• A terrible mistake

• A misunderstanding

What does the speaker suggest about the timing of apologies?

• They should be given only if asked for

• They are unnecessary in most cases

• They should be delayed for impact

• They are more effective when given promptly

What is the speaker's view on the impact of a delayed apology?

• It becomes more meaningful over time

• It loses its significance

• It is better than no apology

• It shows careful consideration

What does the speaker express a desire for at the end of the discussion?

• To forget the incident

• To hear others' opinions

• To take legal action

• To hear the apology