White House Has Not Provided Leadership on Stopping Online Extremism, Rep. Thompson Says

The transcript discusses the challenges of achieving effective leadership and coordination among stakeholders, including the White House, Congress, companies, and advocates, to address election security and foreign interference. It highlights the lack of a dedicated point person in the White House, instability in intelligence leadership, and the need for a coordinated, inclusive process involving all parties. The text also touches on legislative and technological challenges and the role of foreign actors like Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea in compromising election systems.

What is essential for addressing the challenges between the White House and stakeholders?

• Ignoring the stakeholders

• Relying solely on technology

• Involving all stakeholders

• Focusing only on Congress

What is a significant issue in the White House regarding election security?

• Overstaffing

• Excessive funding

• Too many point persons

• Lack of a point person

What is a consequence of the constant churn in the intelligence community?

• More funding

• Lack of stable leadership

• Effective programs

• Increased stability

Which countries are mentioned as potential threats to election security?

• Australia and New Zealand

• Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea

• Brazil and Argentina

• Canada and Mexico

What is necessary for a coordinated leadership process?

• Focusing on one stakeholder

• Ignoring foreign threats

• Involving all stakeholders

• Excluding stakeholders