Gerry McCann Endorses Leveson Report

The transcript discusses the media's initial coverage of a family's appeal for help, followed by false accusations and subsequent damages paid by the media. It highlights the long-term impact on the family and the importance of implementing the Leveson Inquiry's recommendations. The debate over statutory underpinning and its implications for freedom of speech is also covered, along with the Prime Minister's test for the new system's effectiveness in protecting families.

What was the initial reaction of the media towards the McCann family?

• They focused on other unrelated news.

• They were supportive and helped in the search.

• They accused the family of being involved in the disappearance.

• They ignored the case completely.

What was the consequence of the media's false accusations against the McCanns?

• The media apologized immediately and retracted their statements.

• The case was quickly resolved.

• The family was awarded damages but suffered long-term harm.

• The family received public sympathy.

What does the McCann family believe is necessary to prevent similar media mistreatment?

• Complete media censorship.

• Increased public awareness campaigns.

• Implementation of Leveson recommendations in full.

• More media coverage of their case.

What is the main concern regarding statutory underpinning in media regulation?

• It could limit freedom of speech.

• It would be too costly to implement.

• It would not affect media behavior.

• It would only benefit large media corporations.

What was the Prime Minister's test for the new media regulation system?

• Whether it would protect families like the McCanns.

• Whether it would increase media profits.

• Whether it would reduce government control.

• Whether it would improve international relations.