CLEAN : Pistorius sentence fair and just: legal expert

The video discusses the complexities of sentencing in murder convictions, highlighting the minimum sentence of 15 years and the conditions under which a court might deviate from this. It uses Oscar Pistorius's case as an example, noting his ability to convince the court for a lesser sentence due to factors like remorse and disability. The potential for appeal and the role of public interest versus public opinion in judicial decisions are also explored.

What is the minimum sentence for a murder conviction unless compelling circumstances are shown?

• 15 years imprisonment

• Life imprisonment

• 10 years imprisonment

• 20 years imprisonment

What must the convicted person demonstrate to deviate from the minimum sentence?

• Financial compensation to the victim's family

• A good behavior record

• Public support

• Substantial and compelling circumstances

Which factor was NOT mentioned as a reason for Oscar Pistorius's sentence deviation?

• Having a clean criminal record

• Being a disabled person

• Reaching out to the victim's family

• Showing remorse

What is a potential outcome if the case goes to the Supreme Court of Appeal?

• The sentence could be reduced

• The original sentence could be upheld

• The sentence could be increased

• The case could be dismissed

What is the primary role of the court according to the final section?

• To serve public interest

• To serve the media

• To serve public opinion

• To serve the government