Obamacare Has Been Disastrous for the U.S.: Messer

Obamacare Has Been Disastrous for the U.S.: Messer

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the impact of Obamacare on American workers, particularly focusing on the reduction of work hours due to the employer mandate. It contrasts the negative public perception with data showing job growth and increased health insurance coverage. The conversation highlights the need for reforms, such as addressing the medical device tax, and explores potential bipartisan solutions. The debate also touches on the challenges of repealing the mandate without affecting the entire law.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the main criticisms of Obamacare mentioned in the first section?

It lowers healthcare costs significantly.

It reduces the work hours for some employees.

It increases the number of full-time jobs.

It provides universal coverage.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the second section, what is one of the benefits of Obamacare?

It has led to a decrease in full-time jobs.

It has reduced the deficit according to the CBO.

Healthcare costs are growing at a faster rate.

It has increased the number of uninsured people.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the second section suggest about the overall impact of Obamacare?

It has not affected healthcare costs.

It has been a complete failure.

It has only benefited a small number of people.

It is working as intended with some areas needing fixes.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What potential area for bipartisan compromise is mentioned in the third section?

Eliminating the medical device tax.

Increasing the individual mandate.

Reducing the number of insured individuals.

Repealing the entire Obamacare law.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential consequence of repealing the individual mandate, as discussed in the third section?

It would have no impact on the law's effectiveness.

It would lead to adverse selection and unravel the insurance market.

It would strengthen the insurance industry.

It would increase the number of people with health insurance.