Attorney General voices support for emergency terror legislation

The speaker reflects on their role and the privilege of serving, addressing hypothetical questions about their position. They express support for government measures in the House of Commons, asserting legal compatibility with Article 7. The discussion shifts to public interest in law changes, emphasizing the need for risk analysis before release. The speaker acknowledges economic policies affecting the justice system, advocating for reinvestment. Finally, they share valedictory remarks, highlighting the honor of their professional journey.

What is the speaker's stance on the Prime Minister's decision-making regarding his team?

• The speaker believes it is their right to choose the team.

• The speaker thinks the Prime Minister should consult them.

• The speaker supports the Prime Minister's prerogative.

• The speaker is indifferent to the Prime Minister's choices.

Why does the speaker believe there is no illegality in the measures taken in the House of Commons?

• Because the measures are based on public opinion.

• Because a declaration of compatibility has been made.

• Because the measures are temporary.

• Because the measures are not yet implemented.

What justifies the retrospective measures according to the speaker?

• The lack of recent incidents.

• The simplicity of the legal questions involved.

• The need for political gain.

• The public interest outweighing other considerations.

What is the speaker's view on the economic policies affecting the justice system?

• They support further cuts to the justice system.

• They acknowledge the necessity but call for reinvestment.

• They think the policies have no impact.

• They believe the policies are unnecessary.

How does the speaker feel about their role despite the challenges?

• They are eager to leave the position.

• They find it the greatest honor of their professional life.

• They are indifferent to the challenges.

• They regret taking the position.