Harvard's Foreign Farmlands Prove to Be Trouble

Harvard's Foreign Farmlands Prove to Be Trouble

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the investment strategies of a particular activist company and Harvard's approach to gaining an edge over its rivals by directly investing in large-scale assets like farmland. It highlights the risks and legal challenges faced due to these investments, including ongoing court battles. The video also examines the performance issues of university endowments investing in farmland and forestland, perceived as uncorrelated assets. A new team reevaluated the portfolio, leading to asset write-downs and uncovering underlying problems affecting performance.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Harvard's approach to gaining an advantage over its competitors in the investment market?

Partnering with international banks

Focusing on renewable energy projects

Investing in technology startups

Directly investing in large-scale farmland and forestland

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why do university endowments invest in farmland and forestland?

They have low initial costs

They are easy to manage

They offer quick returns

They are considered uncorrelated assets

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What issue arises when the expected positive returns from endowment investments are not realized?

Poor performance and financial losses

Expansion into new markets

Increased investment in technology

Higher management fees

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the new team discover about Harvard's investment portfolio?

The assets were irrelevant to the portfolio

The assets were performing better than expected

The assets were overvalued and underperforming

The assets were perfectly valued

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What historical issue contributed to the poor performance of Harvard's investments?

A sudden market crash in 2010

A legal battle dating back to 2004

A change in government regulations in 2015

A natural disaster affecting the assets