Abandoning the Kurds Is a Terrible Betrayal, Susan Rice Says

The transcript discusses the Syrian conflict, focusing on US involvement and policy decisions. It highlights the Obama administration's strategy to support rebels and fight ISIS without direct military intervention against Assad. The role of Kurdish forces is emphasized, along with the implications of President Trump's decision to withdraw US support. Lessons from past US withdrawals in Iraq are discussed, stressing the importance of maintaining pressure on terrorist groups. The transcript concludes with concerns about the potential resurgence of ISIS and the abandonment of Kurdish allies.

What was the primary concern of the Obama administration regarding military involvement in Syria?

• Fighting Al Qaeda

• Supporting ISIS

• Toppling Assad

• Establishing a no-fly zone

What was the role of Kurdish forces in the fight against ISIS?

• They opposed U.S. intervention

• They were the primary forces fighting ISIS with U.S. support

• They were neutral in the conflict

• They supported Assad's regime

What was the impact of President Trump's decision to withdraw support from the Kurds?

• Immediate peace in Syria

• Potential resurgence of ISIS

• Increased U.S. military presence

• Strengthening Kurdish forces

Why is it important to maintain pressure on terrorist groups according to the lessons learned?

• To prevent the reformation of groups like ISIS

• To ensure permanent U.S. military presence

• To increase military spending

• To support local governments

What could be a consequence of abandoning Kurdish forces holding ISIS prisoners?

• Strengthening of Kurdish forces

• Increased U.S. military presence

• Release of ISIS prisoners back into the fight

• Immediate peace in the region