Cherry: I don’t believe that Boris Johnson is to be trusted

The transcript discusses Boris Johnson's legal situation, focusing on his court pleadings and the skepticism surrounding his statements. It highlights the need for a formal undertaking from the Prime Minister to ensure compliance with the law, given past instances where the government's word was not reliable. The discussion emphasizes the importance of legal documentation to hold the Prime Minister accountable.

What was the main issue with Boris Johnson's statements in court?

• He refused to sign any documents.

• His statements in court conflicted with his public statements.

• He was not present in court.

• He agreed with the judge's skepticism.

Why was the judge skeptical about the undertakings?

• They were not written in English.

• They were too lengthy.

• They were not in a sworn statement.

• They were signed by someone else.

What past event is mentioned to highlight the government's untrustworthiness?

• The climate change summit.

• The Brexit negotiations.

• The prorogation case.

• The general elections.

What is the significance of having a formal undertaking recorded in court?

• It provides legal accountability.

• It allows public access to documents.

• It speeds up the court process.

• It ensures media coverage.

Why is the Prime Minister's word not trusted according to the speaker?

• Because he is new to the position.

• Due to his political party's policies.

• Because of past unfulfilled promises.

• Due to his lack of experience.