CLEAN : Anti Semitic graffiti to stay on Kapoors sculpture

The speaker reflects on the emotional impact of a vandalized art piece, emphasizing its deeper meaning beyond decoration. They discuss the cultural and political implications, likening the situation to a cultural funeral in France. The graffiti on the artwork is seen as a reflection of societal issues and hate, and the speaker argues against removing it to acknowledge its occurrence. The discussion extends to European politics and migration, highlighting the broader societal sadness and challenges.

What was the speaker's initial emotional expectation upon arriving?

• They expected to feel joyful.

• They anticipated feeling like crying.

• They expected to be angry.

• They thought they would be indifferent.

What does the speaker suggest about the purpose of art?

• Art should be purely decorative.

• Art should aim to please everyone.

• Art should reach deeper meanings.

• Art should be ignored.

What is the speaker's view on the graffiti on 'Dirty Corner'?

• It should be immediately removed.

• It should be ignored.

• It represents words of hate and sadness.

• It is just harmless decoration.

How does the speaker relate the vandalism to European politics?

• It is a sign of economic prosperity.

• It shows the success of European integration.

• It reflects the migration crisis in Europe.

• It has no connection to politics.

What does the speaker imply about the current cultural climate?

• It is a time of political stability.

• It is a time of great sadness.

• It is a period of cultural revival.

• It is a time of great joy.