VOICED: Impasse over Bamiyan buddhas, 10 years on

VOICED: Impasse over Bamiyan buddhas, 10 years on

Assessment

Interactive Video

Other

10th Grade - University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the historical significance of the Buddhas of Bamiyan in Afghanistan, which were destroyed by the Taliban in 2001. It highlights UNESCO's efforts and meetings to address the issue, the potential economic benefits of reconstruction for local communities, and the challenges faced due to ongoing conflict. The video also covers public reactions to the destruction and the current status of tourism development in Bamiyan.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the international community's reaction to the destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan?

They were horrified by the destruction.

They were indifferent to the event.

They supported the Taliban's decision.

They were unaware of the event.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What role did UNESCO play in the aftermath of the Buddhas' destruction?

They ignored the situation completely.

They funded the Taliban.

They listed Bamiyan as a World Heritage site.

They immediately rebuilt the statues.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What potential benefits could the reconstruction of the Buddhas bring to the local community?

Increased tourism and job creation.

Higher taxes for locals.

More government control.

Decreased cultural interest.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What are the main challenges in rebuilding the Buddhas of Bamiyan?

Lack of interest from the international community.

Ongoing war and lack of experts willing to work in the area.

No historical records of the original structures.

Excessive funding and resources.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is developing tourism in Bamiyan currently a distant priority?

The Taliban insurgency makes it unsafe.

There are no cultural sites left to visit.

The area is too remote for tourists.

The local government opposes tourism.