Comey on Clinton: I See Evidence of Great Carelessness

Comey on Clinton: I See Evidence of Great Carelessness

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the legal concept of Mens Rea, emphasizing the importance of proving intent in criminal cases. It highlights the 1917 statute on gross negligence, which has been rarely used due to concerns about prosecuting individuals without proving intent. The Department of Justice's cautious approach is noted, with only one known case involving espionage. The video concludes with an analysis of evidence related to Secretary Clinton, determining that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue a case based on gross negligence.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary focus of the concept of Mens Rea in legal cases?

Identifying the location of the crime

Proving the innocence of the accused

Establishing the mental state of the accused

Determining the physical evidence of a crime

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was a major concern about the 1917 statute on gross negligence?

It was too lenient on criminals

It conflicted with the tradition of proving intent

It was not applicable to modern crimes

It was difficult to enforce

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How many times has the Department of Justice used the 1917 statute on gross negligence in 99 years?

Ten times

Five times

Twice

Once

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the conclusion regarding Secretary Clinton's case?

There was sufficient evidence for prosecution

No reasonable prosecutor would bring the case

The case was pursued aggressively

The case was dismissed due to lack of evidence

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why is the concept of gross negligence rarely used in prosecutions?

There are concerns about its appropriateness

It is too complex to understand

It requires proof of intent

It is not recognized by the courts